Renewable Energy Technologies
Cogeneration Technologies
Biofuel Industries
Solar Energy Systems

Trigeneration Technologies

EcoGeneration Solutions LLC. Companies
E-mail:     info @ cogeneration . net
Tel. (832) 758 - 0027
 

Cooler, Cleaner, Greener Power & Energy Solutions 

Home | Contact Us | Links

 
 


Greenhouse Gas Emissions Credits
www.GreenhouseGasEmissionsCredits.com



Technology, Engineering, Products, 
Services and Information

We provide project development services that generate clean energy and significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions and carbon dioxide emissions. Included in this are our turnkey "ecogeneration" products and services which includes renewable energy technologies, waste to energy, waste to watts and waste heat recovery solutions.  Other project development technologies include; Anaerobic Digester, Anaerobic Lagoon, Biogas Recovery, BioMethane, Biomass Gasification, and Landfill Gas To Energy, project development services. 

Unlike most companies, we are equipment supplier/vendor neutral. This means we help our clients select the best equipment for their specific application. This approach provides our customers with superior performance, decreased operating expenses and increased return on investment.

Renewable Energy Technologies provides the following power and energy project development services: 

  • Project Engineering Feasibility & Economic Analysis Studies  

  • Engineering, Procurement and Construction

  • Environmental Engineering & Permitting 

  • Project Funding & Financing Options; including Equity Investment, Debt Financing, Lease and Municipal Lease

  • Shared/Guaranteed Savings Program with No Capital Investment from Qualified Clients 

  • Project Commissioning 

  • 3rd Party Ownership and Project Development

  • Long-term Service Agreements

  • Operations & Maintenance 

  • Green Tag (Renewable Energy Credit, Carbon Dioxide Credits, Emission Reduction Credits) Brokerage Services; Application and Permitting

We are Renewable Energy Technologies specialists and develop clean power and energy projects that will generate a "Renewable Energy Credit," Carbon Dioxide Credits  and Emission Reduction Credits.  Some of our products and services solutions and technologies include; Absorption Chillers, Adsorption Chillers, Automated Demand Response, Biodiesel Refineries, Biofuel Refineries, Biomass Gasification, BioMethane, Canola Biodiesel, Coconut Biodiesel, Cogeneration, Concentrating Solar Power, Demand Response Programs, Demand Side Management, Energy Conservation Measures, Energy Master Planning, Engine Driven Chillers, Solar CHP, Solar Cogeneration, Rapeseed Biodiesel, Solar Electric Heat Pumps, Solar Electric Power Systems, Solar Heating and Cooling, Solar Trigeneration, Soy Biodiesel, and Trigeneration.

Unlike most companies, we are equipment supplier/vendor neutral. This means we help our clients select the best equipment for their specific application. This approach provides our customers with superior performance, decreased operating expenses and increased return on investment. 

For more information: call us at: 832-758-0027

 

 

What are you doing about Carbon Dioxide Emissions 
& Greenhouse Gas Emissions?


The Following Technologies Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions and
Carbon Dioxide Emissions by up to 100%


Cogeneration     Net Zero Energy Houses     Trigeneration

Net Zero Energy Buildings     Sustainable Building Solutions

Solar Cogeneration     Solar Trigeneration

Concentrating Solar Power

Biomethane     B100 Biodiesel     Wind Power Generation

Urban Environmental Accords     Sustainable Urban Living



 

 

Are you doing your part to stop Global Warming and Climate Change?  Learn more about Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Carbon Dioxide Emissions at the following websites:

Carbon Dioxide Emissions
www.CarbonDioxideEmissions.com

 

Greenhouse Gas Emissions
www.GreenhouseGasEmissions.com


 

 

What are Greenhouse Gas Emissions?

Greenhouse Gas Emissions are those greenhouse gases that allow sunlight to enter the atmosphere freely and contribute to the greenhouse effect, which many believe is the cause of global warming. There are natural and man-made greenhouse gas emissions.  The primary greenhouse gases thought to be major contributors to global warming are; carbon dioxide emissions (CO2), methane emissions (CH 4) and nitrogen oxides (N2O). 

The primary sources of greenhouse gas emissions from manmade sources include; fossil-fueled power plants such as natural gas power plants and coal fired power plants. Other sources of greenhouse gas emissions linked to manmade causes include  internal combustion engines (fueled by gasoline and petroleum diesel) and deforestation.

Many people don't realize that as much as 25% of  per cent of the carbon dioxide emissions are naturally absorbed by the ocean and another 25% of the carbon dioxide emissions are absorbed by our biosphere, such as trees, plants, soil, etc.  This leaves about 50% of the carbon dioxide emissions that are not absorbed and remaining in our atmosphere. As previously stated, carbon dioxide emissions are linked primarily to the burning of fossil fuels (power plants, cars, trucks, etc.) and deforestation.

Greenhouse gas emissions have been on the increase ever since the dawn of the industrial revolution.


What Are Greenhouse Gases?

Many chemical compounds found in the Earth’s atmosphere act as “greenhouse gases.” These gases allow sunlight to enter the atmosphere freely. When sunlight strikes the Earth’s surface, some of it is reflected back towards space as infrared radiation (heat). Greenhouse gases absorb this infrared radiation and trap the heat in the atmosphere. Over time, the amount of energy sent from the sun to the Earth’s surface should be about the same as the amount of energy radiated back into space, leaving the temperature of the Earth’s surface roughly constant.

Many gases exhibit these “greenhouse” properties. Some of them occur in nature (water vapor, carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide), while others are exclusively human-made (like gases used for aerosols).

How Can We Decrease Greenhouse Gas Emissions?

Cogeneration, for industrial customers, and trigeneration, for commercial applications, are the most efficient ways of producing energy for these applications. Cogeneration, at around 60-70% efficiency, is more than twice the efficiency of traditional power plants. Cogeneration is the simultaneous production of electrical and thermal energy, and is the best method of generating electricity and steam for industrial customers such as refineries, plastics, and paper/wood industries.  Trigeneration, at about 90% efficiency, is about 300% more efficient over traditional electric power plants. Trigeneration is the simultaneous production of cooling, heating and power, and the best method for generating power and energy for commercial customers like office buildings, schools, universities, military bases, shopping centers, radio/television stations, and casinos, among many other commercial applications.  

Why Are Atmospheric Levels Increasing?

Levels of several important greenhouse gases have increased by about 25 percent since large-scale industrialization began around 150 years ago (Figure 1). During the past 20 years, about three-quarters of human-made carbon dioxide emissions were from burning fossil fuels.

Figure 1. Trends in Atmospheric Concentrations and Anthropogenic Emissions of Carbon Dioxide

Figure 1 is a line graph showing the trends in atmospheric concentrations and anthropogenic emissions of carbon dioxide.


Concentrations of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere are naturally regulated by numerous processes collectively known as the “carbon cycle” (Figure 2). The movement (“flux”) of carbon between the atmosphere and the land and oceans is dominated by natural processes, such as plant photosynthesis. While these natural processes can absorb some of the net 6.1 billion metric tons of anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions produced each year (measured in carbon equivalent terms), an estimated 3.2 billion metric tons is added to the atmosphere annually. The Earth’s positive imbalance between emissions and absorption results in the continuing growth in greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.

Figure 2. Global Carbon Cycle (Billion Metric Tons Carbon)

Figure 2 is a flow diagram showing the global carbon cycle.

What Effect Do Greenhouse Gases Have on Climate Change?

Given the natural variability of the Earth’s climate, it is difficult to determine the extent of change that humans cause. In computer-based models, rising concentrations of greenhouse gases generally produce an increase in the average temperature of the Earth. Rising temperatures may, in turn, produce changes in weather, sea levels, and land use patterns, commonly referred to as “climate change.”

Assessments generally suggest that the Earth’s climate has warmed over the past century and that human activity affecting the atmosphere is likely an important driving factor. A National Research Council study dated May 2001 stated, “Greenhouse gases are accumulating in Earth’s atmosphere as a result of human activities, causing surface air temperatures and sub-surface ocean temperatures to rise. Temperatures are, in fact, rising. The changes observed over the last several decades are likely mostly due to human activities, but we cannot rule out that some significant part of these changes is also a reflection of natural variability.”

However, there is uncertainty in how the climate system varies naturally and reacts to emissions of greenhouse gases. Making progress in reducing uncertainties in projections of future climate will require better awareness and understanding of the buildup of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere and the behavior of the climate system.


What Are the Sources of Greenhouse Gases?

In the U.S., our greenhouse gas emissions come mostly from energy use. These are driven largely by economic growth, fuel used for electricity generation, and weather patterns affecting heating and cooling needs. Energy-related carbon dioxide emissions, resulting from petroleum and natural gas, represent 82 percent of total U.S. human-made greenhouse gas emissions (Figure 3). The connection between energy use and carbon dioxide emissions is explored in the box on the reverse side (Figure 4).

Figure 3. U.S. Anthropogenic Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Gas, 2001
(Million Metric Tons of Carbon Equivalent)

Figure 3 is a pie chart showing the anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions in the U.S. by gas type.

 

Figure 4. U.S. Primary Energy Consumption and Carbon Dioxide Emissions, 2001

Figure 4 is a  charting of the U.S. primary energy consumption with the resulting carbon dioxide emissions. For more detailed information about this chart, please call the National Energy Information Center at (202)586-8800.

Another greenhouse gas, methane, comes from landfills, coal mines, oil and gas operations, and agriculture; it represents 9 percent of total emissions. Nitrogen oxides (5 percent of total emissions), meanwhile, is emitted from burning fossil fuels and through the use of certain fertilizers and industrial processes. Human-made gases (2 percent of total emissions) are released as byproducts of industrial processes and through leakage.

What Is the Prospect for Future Emissions?

World carbon dioxide emissions are expected to increase by 1.9 percent annually between 2001 and 2025 (Figure 5). Much of the increase in these emissions is expected to occur in the developing world where emerging economies, such as China and India, fuel economic development with fossil energy. Developing countries’ emissions are expected to grow above the world average at 2.7 percent annually between 2001 and 2025; and surpass emissions of industrialized countries near 2018.

Figure 5. World Carbon Dioxide Emissions by Region, 2001-2025
(Million Metric Tons of Carbon Equivalent)

Figure 5 is a line graph showing world carbon dioxide emissions by region from 2001-2025.

The U.S. produces about 25 percent of global carbon dioxide emissions from burning fossil fuels; primarily because our economy is the largest in the world and we meet 85 percent of our energy needs through burning fossil fuels. The U.S. is projected to lower its carbon intensity by 25 percent from 2001 to 2025, and remain below the world average (Figure 6).

Figure 6. Carbon Intensity by Region, 2001-2025
(Metric Tons of Carbon Equivalent per Million $1997)

Figure 6 is also a line graph showing carbon intensity by region from 2001-2025.

Energy Production and Carbon Dioxide Emissions

For over one hundred years, energy and power production have been generated around the world through the burning of fossil fuels, including;  fuel oil, coal, diesel, and natural gas.  Over the past decade, environmental science and research has discovered and linked global warming, and global climate change to the carbon dioxide emissions from the combustion of fossil fuels.  This has placed an increased need to reduce energy consumption and discover more environmentally friendly fuel sources. 

A Cogeneration powerplant produces heat and power simultaneously by burning a primary fuel like natural gas, or biomethane.   Cogeneration plants typically reach system efficiencies of 60% to 70% - or about double that of standard power plants.  Trigeneration plants produce 3 energies - cooling, heating and power - simultaneously, with one fuel input and combustion process (such as natural gas or biomethane) and is an environmentally-friendlier method of generating electricity. Trigeneration, at around 90% efficiency, is about 300% more efficient than typical power plants, and 50% more efficient than cogeneration plants.  Cogeneration and trigeneration power plants are much less expensive and costly in terms of both economic and environmental expenses, than traditional forms of power generation.  There are also far fewer carbon and carbon dioxide emissions generated through co/trigeneration.  

Trigeneration slashes carbon dioxide emissions by as much 80% and more.

In 1992, managers of the 2.8-million-square-foot McCormick Place Exhibition and Convention Center in Chicago were planning an addition that would double the size of their convention center. To avoid $27 million in capital costs for a new heating and cooling system, the McCormick Place managers selected a new trigeneration system under an energy outsource or energy services agreement. The new trigeneration system simultaneously provides the McCormick Place Convention Center with heating, cooling, and electricity and achieves an overall efficiency rating of 93%.  Besides the initial savings of not having to spend $27 million for the new system, McCormick Place also saves >$1 million annually in energy and operating expenses. The system produces about half the carbon dioxide emissions of a traditional system, as well as 24,000 tons of carbon dioxide and 59 tons of nitrogen oxides (NOx) each year when compared to a traditional system.  

Coors Brewing Company has a 90 percent efficient trigeneration system at its Golden, Colorado plant, the largest single brewing site in the world. The trigeneration system saves 250,000 tons of carbon dioxide annually, along with 125 tons of NOx and 900 tons of SO2. 

* A New Perspective on Energy

Integrated systems for cooling, heating and power (CHP) for buildings incorporate multiple technologies for providing energy services to a single building or to a campus of buildings. Electricity to such buildings is provided by on-site or near-site power generators using one or more of the many options: internal combustion (IC) engines, combustion turbines, miniturbines or microturbines, and fuel cells. In CHP systems, waste heat from power generation equipment is recovered for operating equipment for cooling, heating, or controlling humidity in buildings, by using absorption chillers, desiccant dehumidifiers, or heat recovery equipment for producing steam or hot water. These integrated systems are known by a variety of acronyms: CHP, Trigeneration and IES (Integrated Energy System). 

CHP systems provide many benefits, including:

reduced energy costs, 
improved power reliability, 
increased energy efficiency, and 
improved environmental quality. 

What is a CHP System?

A CHP System is an efficient, environmentally-friendly "cogeneration" system that provides power (electricity) and energy (hot water and/or steam) at the location the power and energy are needed also known as "distributed generation." Cogeneration systems are at least two times more efficient than typical power plants which average about 27% - 35% efficiency - meaning 65% to 73% of the energy is wasted. 

What is a CHP System with Absorption Chillers or "Trigeneration"? 

Even more efficient than a standard CHP system is a CHP system that incorporates absorption chillers, which is  then a "trigeneration" system, also referred to as an "Integrated Energy System" or "Cooling, Heating and Power."  Trigeneration systems can be up to 50% more efficient than cogeneration systems and many average about 90% or more efficiency.  Absorption chillers recover the additional waste heat from CHP Systems to make chilled water for air-conditioning, thereby providing the building or facility's electricity, hot water/steam and air conditioning.

Some of the above information courtesy of the U.S. Department of Energy with our thanks.

Are you doing your part to stop Global Warming and Climate Change

Learn more about the leading causes of
Global Warming and Climate Change, which are Carbon Dioxide Emissions and Greenhouse Gas Emissions at the following websites:

Carbon Dioxide Emissions
www.CarbonDioxideEmissions.com
 

Greenhouse Gas Emissions
www.GreenhouseGasEmissions.com
 

For more information on how your company can reduce, or eliminate Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Carbon Dioxide Emissions, visit one of our sponsors below. All of the following companies offer products and technologies that are "sustainable" and reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Carbon Dioxide Emissions.

Please Visit And Support Our Following Sponsors! 


Biofuel Industries

www.BiofuelIndustries.com
Leaders in:  Anaerobic Digesters, Biomethane
B100 Biodiesel, Biomass Gasification & E100 Ethanol
 

Cogeneration Technologies
www.Cogeneration.net
Cooler, Cleaner, Greener Power and Energy Solutions™


Net Zero Energy Buildings™
www.NetZeroEnergyBuildings.com
The Future Belongs to the Sustainable!™


Renewable Energy Technologies
www.RenewableEnergyTechnologies.com


Solar Energy Systems
www.SolarEnergySystems.net
Exclusive Providers & Developers of 
Solar Trigeneration
Power and Energy Systems

Sustainable Building Solutions, Inc.™
www.SustainableBuildingSolutions.com
"The Future Belongs to the Sustainable"™


Net Zero Energy Houses™
www.NetZeroEnergyHouses.com
"The Future Belongs to the Sustainable"™


Trigeneration Technologies
www.Trigeneration.com
Cooler, Cleaner, Greener Power and Energy Solutions

 

For more information about domain names, website hosting, business planning, or sales and marketing services, contact us at:  target_market_advertising@yahoo.com

 

Energy Production and Carbon Dioxide Emissions

For over one hundred years, energy and power production have been generated around the world through the burning of fossil fuels, including;  fuel oil, coal, diesel, and natural gas.  Over the past decade, environmental science and research has discovered and linked global warming, and global climate change to the carbon dioxide emissions from the combustion of fossil fuels.  This has placed an increased need to reduce energy consumption and discover more environmentally friendly fuel sources. 

Co/trigeneration is the simultaneous production of electricity and thermal energy at the same time, with one fuel input and combustion process (such as natural gas) and is an environmentally-friendlier method of generating electricity. Co/trigeneration is much less expensive and costly in terms of both economic and environmental expenses, than traditional forms of power generation.  There are also far fewer carbon and carbon dioxide emissions generated through co/trigeneration.  

Co/trigeneration slashes carbon dioxide emissions by as much 80% and more.

In 1992, managers of the 2.8-million-square-foot McCormick Place Exhibition and Convention Center in Chicago were planning an addition that would double the size of their convention center. To avoid $27 million in capital costs for a new heating and cooling system, the McCormick Place managers selected Trigen Energy Corporation of White Plains, New York to install a new trigeneration system under an energy outsource or energy services agreement. Trigen installed the new trigeneration system that simultaneously provides the McCormick Place Convention Center with heating, cooling, and electricity and achieves an overall efficiency rating of 93%.  Besides the initial savings of not having to spend $27 million for the new system, McCormick Place also saves >$1 million annually in energy and operating expenses. The system produces about half the carbon dioxide emissions of a traditional system, as well as 24,000 tons of carbon dioxide and 59 tons of nitrogen oxides (NOx) each year when compared to a traditional system.  

Coors Brewing Company has a 90 percent efficient trigeneration system at its Golden, Colorado plant, the largest single brewing site in the world. The trigeneration system saves 250,000 tons of carbon dioxide annually, along with 125 tons of NOx and 900 tons of SO2. 

 

Carbon Dioxide Emissions from the Generation of Electric Power in the United States

July 2000



Introduction

The President issued a directive on April 15, 1999, requiring an annual report summarizing the carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions produced by the generation of electricity by utilities and nonutilities in the United States. In response, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) jointly submitted the first report on October 15, 1999. This is the second annual report(1) that estimates the CO2 emissions attributable to the generation of electricity in the United States. The data on CO2 emissions and the generation of electricity were collected and prepared by the Energy Information Administration (EIA), and the report was jointly written by DOE and EPA to address the five areas outlined in the Presidential Directive.

  • The emissions of CO2 are presented on the basis of total mass (tons) and output rate (pounds per kilowatthour). The information is stratified by the type of fuel used for electricity generation and presented for both regional and national levels. The percentage of electricity generation produced by each fuel type or energy resource is indicated.

  • The 1999 data on CO2 emissions and generation by fuel type are compared to the same data for the previous year, 1998. Factors contributing to regional and national level changes in the amount and average output rate of CO2 are identified and discussed.

  • The Energy Information Administration's most recent projections of CO2 emissions and generation by fuel type for 1999 are compared to the actual data summarized in this report to identify deviations between projected and actual CO2 emissions and electricity generation.

  • Information for 1998 on voluntary carbon-reducing and carbon-sequestration projects reported by the electric power sector and the resulting amount of CO2 reductions are presented. Included are programs undertaken by the utilities themselves as well as programs supported by the Federal government to support voluntary CO2 reductions.

  • Appropriate updates to the Department of Energy's estimated environmental effects of the Administration's proposed restructuring legislation are included.


Electric Power Industry CO2 Emissions and
Generation Share by Fuel Type

In 1999,(2) estimated emissions of CO2 in the United States resulting from the generation of electric power were 2,245 million metric tons,(3) an increase of 1.4 percent from the 2,215 million metric tons in 1998. The estimated generation of electricity from all sources increased by 2.0 percent, going from 3,617 billion kilowatthours to 3,691 billion kilowatthours. Electricity generation from coal-fired plants, the primary source of CO2 emissions from electricity generation, was nearly the same in 1999 as in 1998. Much of the increase in electricity generation was produced by gas-fired plants and nuclear plants. The 1999 national average output rate,(4) 1.341 pounds of CO2 per kilowatthour generated, also showed a slight change from 1.350 pounds CO2 per kilowatthour in 1998 (Table 1). While the share of total generation provided by fossil fuels rose slightly, a reduction in the emission rate for coal-fired generation combined with growth in the market share of gas-fired generation contributed to the modest improvement in the output rate.(5)

Table 1. Summary of Carbon Dioxide Emissions and Net Generation in the United States, 1998 and 1999

 

1998

1999p

Change

Percent
Change

Carbon Dioxide (thousand metric tons)a

 

 

 

 

  Coal

1,799,762

1,787,910

-11,852

-0.66

  Petroleum

110,244

106,294

-3,950

-3.58

  Gas

291,236

337,004

45,768

15.72

  Other Fuels b

13,596

13,596

-

-

   U.S. Total

2,214,837

2,244,804

29,967

1.35

Generation (million kWh)

 

 

 

 

   Coal

1,873,908

1,881,571

7,663

0.41

   Petroleum

126,900

119,025

-7,875

-6.21

   Gas

488,712

562,433

73,721

15.08

   Other Fuels b

21,747

21,749

2

-

   Total Fossil-fueled

2,511,267  

2,584,779

73,512  

2.93

   Nonfossil-fueled c

1,105,947

1,106,294

347

0.03

   U.S. Total

3,617,214

3,691,073

73,509

2.04

Output Rate d (pounds CO2 per kWh)

 

 

 

 

   Coal

2.117

2.095

-0.022

-1.04

   Petroleum

1.915

1.969

0.054

2.82

   Gas

1.314

1.321

0.007

0.53

   Other Fuels b

1.378

1.378

-

-

U.S. Average

1.350

1.341

-0.009

-0.67

   a One metric ton equals one short ton divided by 1.1023. To convert carbon dioxide to carbon units, divide by 44/12.
   b Other fuels include municipal solid waste, tires, and other fuels that emit anthropogenic CO2 when burned to generate electricity. Nonutility data for 1999 for these fuels are unavailable; 1998 data are used.
   c Nonfossil includes nuclear, hydroelectric, solar, wind, geothermal, biomass, and other fuels or energy sources with zero or net zero CO2 emissions. Although geothermal contributes a small amount of CO2 emissions, in this report it is included in nonfossil.
   dU.S. average output rate is based on generation from all energy sources.
   P= Preliminary data.
   - = No change.
   Note: Data for 1999 are preliminary. Data for 1998 are final.
   Sources: •Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-759, "Monthly Power Plant Report"; Form EIA-767,"Steam-Electric Plant Operation and Design Report"; Form EIA-860B, "Annual Electric Generator Report -Nonutility"; and Form 900, "Monthly Nonutility Power Report." •Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, FERC Form 423, "Monthly Report of Cost and Quality of Fuels for Electric Plants."


In the United States, about 40.5 percent(6) of anthropogenic CO2 emissions was attributed to the combustion of fossil fuels for the generation of electricity in 1998, the latest year for which all data are available.(7) The available energy sources used for electricity generation result in varying output rates for CO2 emissions from region to region across the United States. Although all regions use some fossil fuels for electricity generation, several States generate almost all electricity at nuclear or hydroelectric plants, resulting in correspondingly low output rates of CO2 per kilowatthour. For example, Vermont produces mostly nuclear power, while Washington, Idaho, and Oregon generate almost all electricity at hydroelectric plants. At the other extreme, Colorado, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, New Mexico, North Dakota, Ohio, West Virginia, and Wyoming--a group that includes some of the Nation's largest coal-producing States--generate most of their electricity with coal. Regions where coal-fired generators dominate the industry show the highest rates of CO2 emissions per kilowatthour.

Coal

Estimated emissions of CO2 produced by coal-fired generation of electricity were 1,788 million metric tons in 1999 (Table 1), 0.7 percent less than in 1998, while electricity generation from coal was 0.4 percent more than the previous year. The divergent direction of generation and emissions changes may reflect a combination of thermal efficiency improvements, changes in average fuel characteristics, and variances associated with both sampling and nonsampling errors. CO2 emissions from coal-fired electricity generation comprise nearly 80 percent of the total CO2 emissions produced by the generation of electricity in the United States, while the share of electricity generation from coal was 51.0 percent in 1999 (Table 3). Coal has the highest carbon intensity among fossil fuels, resulting in coal-fired plants having the highest output rate of CO2 per kilowatthour. The national average output rate for coal-fired electricity generation was 2.095 pounds CO2 per kilowatthour in 1999 (Table 4).

Coal-fired generation contributes over 90 percent of CO2 emissions in the East North Central, West North Central, East South Central, and Mountain Census Divisions and 84 percent in the South Atlantic Census Division (Table 2). Nearly two-thirds of the Nation's CO2 emissions from electricity generation are accounted for by the combustion of coal for electricity generation in these five regions where most of the Nation's coal-producing States are located. Consequently, these regions have relatively high output rates of CO2 per kilowatthour.

Table 2. Estimated Carbon Dioxide Emissions From Generating Units at U.S. Electric Plants by Census Division, 1998 and 1999 (Thousand Metric Tons)

Census Division

1998

1999

Total

Coal

Petroleum

Gas

Othera

Total

Coal

Petroleum

Gas

Othera

New England

50,450

16,470

23,068

7,966

2,945

52,822

14,637

24,224

11,015

2,945

Middle Atlantic

189,023

139,821

17,315

28,441

3,447

190,214

134,528

15,232

37,007

3,447

East North Central

427,580

410,141

4,351

12,039

1,049

423,063

397,266

5,415

19,333

1,049

West North Central

217,123

209,858

1,521

4,726

1,018

219,104

208,786

1,957

7,342

1,018

South Atlantic

445,435

373,780

43,777

24,515

3,363

452,180

378,018

41,356

29,442

3,363

East South Central

226,749

212,350

5,018

9,299

82

228,240

214,486

3,212

10,460

82

West South Central

364,056

214,544

5,461

143,945

106

380,792

221,309

5,744

153,634

106

Mountain

219,147

206,256

888

12,002

*

217,543

202,421

1,278

13,843

*

Pacific Contiguous

64,668

14,555

2,588

46,165

1,360

70,591

14,563

2,153

52,515

1,360

Pacific Noncontiguous

10,606

1,985

6,257

2,138

225

10,256

1,895

5,724

2,413

225

U.S. Total

2,214,837

1,799,762

110,244

291,236

13,596

2,244,804

1,787,910

106,294

337,004

13,596

   aOther fuels include municipal solid waste, tires, and other fuels that emit anthropogenic CO2 when burned to generate electricity. Nonutility data for 1999 for these fuels are unavailable; 1998 data are used.
   * = the absolute value is less than 0.5.
   Note: Data for 1999 are preliminary. Data for 1998 are final.
   Sources: •Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-759, "Monthly Power Plant Report"; Form EIA-767, "Steam-Electric Plant Operation and Design Report"; Form EIA-860B, "Annual Electric Generator Report - Nonutility"; Form EIA-900, "Monthly Nonutility Power Report." •Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, FERC Form 423, "Monthly Report of Cost and Quality of Fuels for Electric Plants."



Table 3. Percent of Electricity Generated at U.S. Electric Plants by Fuel Type and Census Division, 1998 and 1999
(Percent)

Census Division

1998

1999

Coal

Petroleum

Gas

Othera

Nonfossil

Coal

Petroleum

Gas

Othera

Nonfossil

New England

17.9

24.4 

13.8

4.6

39.3

16.3

22.9 

18.0

4.6

38.3

Middle Atlantic

38.4

5.2

13.6

1.3

41.5

35.8

4.5

17.5

1.3

40.9

East North Central

76.3

0.8

3.8

0.4

18.8

72.0

0.7

4.4

0.4

22.5

West North Central

75.5

0.7

2.3

0.3

21.1

73.9

0.7

3.0

0.3

22.0

South Atlantic

55.3

7.2

6.6

0.7

30.2

55.5

6.7

7.8

0.7

29.2

East South Central

66.2

2.1

3.2

*

28.4

68.0

1.4

3.9

*

26.7

West South Central

39.1

0.6

42.2

0.3

17.8

40.1

0.7

44.6

0.3

14.3

Mountain

67.9

0.2

6.8

0.1

25.0

67.5

0.3

8.1

0.1

24.1

Pacific Contiguous

4.3

0.7

23.1

0.4

71.4

4.2

0.5

26.2

0.4

68.7